raff淫雨霏霏
发表于 2025-3-21 17:00:08
书目名称Is Science Sexist?影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Is Science Sexist?读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0475501<br><br> <br><br>
摘要记录
发表于 2025-3-21 23:24:04
Karl Popper and Evolutionary Biology,m Huxley was to clash in such dramatic fashion in 1860 at the British Association’s debate on human origins, Richard Owen! Darwin, I am afraid, came very much down the list — although to do a justice to Huxley, which he would probably not appreciate, in 1851, on the basis of published work, he was quite right to rate Owen far above Darwin.
旧式步枪
发表于 2025-3-22 01:09:58
1566-659X oes back to the Greeks. However, until recently in this century, it was sadly neglected. With a few noteworthy exceptions, someone wishing to delve into the subject had to choose between extremes of insipid vitalism on the one hand, and sterile formalizations of the most elementary biological princi
Ornament
发表于 2025-3-22 06:15:57
Book 1981o the Greeks. However, until recently in this century, it was sadly neglected. With a few noteworthy exceptions, someone wishing to delve into the subject had to choose between extremes of insipid vitalism on the one hand, and sterile formalizations of the most elementary biological principles on th
PATHY
发表于 2025-3-22 10:27:58
The Evidence for Evolutionary Theory,thetic theory simply a grandiose exercise in system building, the castle in the sky to end all castles in the sky, or can it command our respect as a reasonably well-confirmed theory? Is it fact or is it fiction?
MOT
发表于 2025-3-22 15:45:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4756/475501/475501_6.png
Adherent
发表于 2025-3-22 17:30:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4756/475501/475501_7.png
conformity
发表于 2025-3-23 01:08:50
Book 1981 con strained to stay only with theoretical parts of biology, but can range over to more medical parts of the spectrum. At the same time, biology itself has had one of the most fruitful yet turbulent periods in its whole history, and more and more biologists have grown to see that many of the probl
KIN
发表于 2025-3-23 02:06:20
The Last Word on Teleology, or Optimality Models Vindicated,one can cheerfully move the discussion into the unreal world of the imagination so beloved by philosophers. Biology forgotten, one can talk about door knobs serving as paper weights, sewing machines with buttons to be pressed when one wants them to self-destruct, multi-purposed water beds, or whatev
Misgiving
发表于 2025-3-23 09:02:57
The Molecular Revolution in Genetics,olecular basis of heredity. As Watson and Crick laconically remarked at the conclusion of their paper: “It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material” (ibid.). Thus started the molecular revolutio