certitude
发表于 2025-3-27 00:27:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475492/475492_31.png
Firefly
发表于 2025-3-27 02:22:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475492/475492_32.png
Fallibility
发表于 2025-3-27 07:24:26
Realism, Non-Realism and Atheism: Why Believe in an Objectively Real God?The transcendent God has for many become an unavailable God. As Jean-Paul Sartre proclaims in his play .:
保存
发表于 2025-3-27 12:04:14
Great Expectations: Philosophy, Ontology and ReligionContributors to this volume were invited to reflect on issues raised in the course of it. In responding to the invitation, I hope to show that some of these issues are central, not simply in the philosophy of religion, but in philosophy generally.
招待
发表于 2025-3-27 13:49:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475492/475492_35.png
BULLY
发表于 2025-3-27 19:48:17
Religious Realism and Non-Realism: Defining the Issueon today. I say ‘today’ because although logically this issue is basic in a timeless sense, it has only come to be generally seen as an issue at all during the last hundred and fifty or so years — roughly since the pioneering work of Feuerbach — and has become sharply focused within the Western reli
看法等
发表于 2025-3-27 22:18:27
Ludwig Feuerbach’s Philosophy of Godne hand, and the opposition asserted to the traditional divine referent of religion in Western religions and philosophical thought, on the other hand. It is this peculiar combination which distinguishes Feuerbach as a philosopher of religion. It would be very difficult to find another Western thinke
Cholecystokinin
发表于 2025-3-28 05:00:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475492/475492_38.png
Gossamer
发表于 2025-3-28 08:56:08
Zen and the Problem of Languageeligious terms refer to actual objective things, it is worth noting that there is an East Asian tradition which has for many centuries maintained a strict non-realistic approach to language. I refer, of course, to Buddhism in its Mahayana form. Though not much has been written about Zen non-realism,
不舒服
发表于 2025-3-28 10:34:44
On Really Believingeks to clarify the grammar of that belief, he must choose between realism and non-realism. These, it is thought, are the only philosophical alternatives open to him. According to Terence Penelhum, ‘Most atheists and agnostics are theological realists, and obviously most defenders and apologists for