FID
发表于 2025-3-23 13:31:15
R. M. M. El-Kilani,M. Sugitaablish that there is something inherently objectionable about paternalistic interference. If any such argument is successful against epistemic paternalism, such paternalism is not a viable option in our attempts to come to terms with our dual tendency for bias and overconfidence, no matter how convi
Chronic
发表于 2025-3-23 14:12:17
A. Kubota,B. Zayed,H. Fujimaki,T. Higashi,S. Yoshida,M. M. A. Mahmoud,Y. Kitamura,W. H. Abou El Hassablish that there is something inherently objectionable about paternalistic interference. If any such argument is successful against epistemic paternalism, such paternalism is not a viable option in our attempts to come to terms with our dual tendency for bias and overconfidence, no matter how convi
ETCH
发表于 2025-3-23 22:03:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475464/475464_13.png
托运
发表于 2025-3-23 23:18:15
S. Maruyama,S. M. M. Shebl,K. I. Abdel-Gawad,A. Kubota,K. Shimizu,N. Ishikawa,A. E. D. H. Mohameddorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi
TIA742
发表于 2025-3-24 06:26:25
A. T. Elbendary,M. Nawar,S. Matsushitahe locality of rational evaluation (in conjunction with a reasonable appreciation of epistemic diversity) commits the Wittgenstenian to a further epistemic incommensurability thesis. Next, Duncan Pritchard’s (e.g. 2009; 2015) novel attempt to save the hinge epistemologist from a commitment to episte
刚开始
发表于 2025-3-24 09:35:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475464/475464_16.png
偏见
发表于 2025-3-24 14:05:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475464/475464_17.png
Chronological
发表于 2025-3-24 17:01:59
l yield different results. Epistemic evaluation, however, involves epistemic standards and appropriate epistemic goals. A theory of epistemic justification must therefore address the question of the aim and objective of epistemic justification, that is, what is the point of epistemic justification a
chemoprevention
发表于 2025-3-24 21:54:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475464/475464_19.png
incision
发表于 2025-3-24 23:23:14
A. Kubota,B. Zayed,H. Fujimaki,T. Higashi,S. Yoshida,M. M. A. Mahmoud,Y. Kitamura,W. H. Abou El Hassue. That, I have argued, is what epistemic paternalism is. Moreover, I suggested towards the end of Chapter 2 that it is not part of its definition that there is anything objectionable about epistemic paternalism. But by the same logic, it also is not part of the definition that practising epistemic