轮流
发表于 2025-3-23 12:33:16
Norbert Henzethe debate there are those epistemologists (internalists) who require the justifying factors of a belief to be cognitively accessible to the agent. Accordingly, something can be regarded as a justifier, that is, confer justification on a belief only if it is reflectively accessible to the subject. E
delusion
发表于 2025-3-23 15:09:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475463/475463_12.png
Instantaneous
发表于 2025-3-23 20:03:10
l yield different results. Epistemic evaluation, however, involves epistemic standards and appropriate epistemic goals. A theory of epistemic justification must therefore address the question of the aim and objective of epistemic justification, that is, what is the point of epistemic justification a
五行打油诗
发表于 2025-3-24 01:34:00
Norbert Henzebe of use to students in upper level degree programs who want to design empirical research into social change as well as researchers in sociology, political science and public policy..978-3-030-19149-8978-3-030-19150-4
话
发表于 2025-3-24 06:17:27
enten (Spiegelungsprinzip), Kombinatorik, elementarer Stochastik und Analysis fasziniert.. Gegenüber der ersten, unter einem etwas anderen Titel erschienenen Auflage, wurden neben zahlreichen Korrekturen zusätzliche Erklärungen eingefügt und Aktualisierungen vorgenommen..978-3-658-22858-3
Lethargic
发表于 2025-3-24 08:03:06
emic governance as a new paradigm for research into global social change.. This book will be of use to students in upper level degree programs who want to design empirical research into social change as well as researchers in sociology, political science and public policy..
植物群
发表于 2025-3-24 11:21:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475463/475463_17.png
联想记忆
发表于 2025-3-24 16:40:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475463/475463_18.png
发怨言
发表于 2025-3-24 22:24:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4755/475463/475463_19.png
的事物
发表于 2025-3-25 02:47:44
Norbert Henzef one thought of the justifying factors (evidence) in a way that required of the cognizer to be actually aware of them, then that would be an example of a strong form of internalism, a version that recognizes as justifiers only those putative grounds that are within the cognizer’s perspective on the