空中 发表于 2025-3-30 11:17:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4731/473001/473001_51.pngverdict 发表于 2025-3-30 12:45:06
F. Ungerted Physics for over two centuries until they clashed with Maxwell’s electromagnetism. Classical physics assumed that space is immutable and its geometry obeys the Euclidean postulates. Furthermore, distances and time intervals are believed invariant, i. e. , independent of the state of motion. BothInfirm 发表于 2025-3-30 18:57:01
H. H. Scheld,M. Deiwick,J. Rötkermpletely out of touch with the requirements of modern science. His further criticisms of orthodoxy were taken only as demonstrating yet again his lack of understanding and appreciation; it is doubtful if many physicists of the day bothered to read either EPR or Bohr’s response before deciding who wa失败主义者 发表于 2025-3-30 21:30:34
F. Saborowski In 1912, Einstein. had written: “The more success the quantum theory has, the sillier it looks‘, and his feelings had probably not changed much during the 12 years before 1912 and the 13 afterwards up to 1925. Now at last it seemed that one could hope to study atoms and light from a well-defined thPcos971 发表于 2025-3-31 01:12:52
mpletely out of touch with the requirements of modern science. His further criticisms of orthodoxy were taken only as demonstrating yet again his lack of understanding and appreciation; it is doubtful if many physicists of the day bothered to read either EPR or Bohr’s response before deciding who wa难解 发表于 2025-3-31 08:51:12
H. Mörlhis death. While some chapters use mathematics at an undergraduate physics level, a path is provided for the reader more concerned with ideas than equations, and the book should be of interest to anybody interested in Einstein and his approach to the quantum..978-1-4419-2445-2978-0-387-71520-9自由职业者 发表于 2025-3-31 09:44:11
R. Zotz,S. Genthmpletely out of touch with the requirements of modern science. His further criticisms of orthodoxy were taken only as demonstrating yet again his lack of understanding and appreciation; it is doubtful if many physicists of the day bothered to read either EPR or Bohr’s response before deciding who wa