AVOW
发表于 2025-3-28 15:16:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4729/472821/472821_41.png
删减
发表于 2025-3-28 21:52:46
: Reoccupation in Blumenbergian Modernitychs of thinking. I take up Blumenberg’s idea of a “concept of reality” (.) and his notion of “reoccupation” (.), and link them to both his phenomenological account of subjectivity and his anthropological assumptions. I offer an understanding of “reoccupation” as a hermeneutical tool that grasps epochal changes.
表状态
发表于 2025-3-29 00:55:09
Modernizing Blumenbergtion (.) for historical change. I contrast his static, transcendent notion of form with a tendency to immanent, metamorphic formal productivity in modernity (Bruno, Spinoza, Diderot, Simondon), to which he seems blind.
不知疲倦
发表于 2025-3-29 03:20:18
2524-714X des a variety of leading contributors from the UK, North Ame.Interrogating Modernity .returns to Hans Blumenberg‘s epochal .The Legitimacy of the Modern Age .as a springboard to interrogate questions of modernity, secularisation, technology and political legitimacy in the fields of political theolog
Mucosa
发表于 2025-3-29 07:22:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4729/472821/472821_45.png
愤怒历史
发表于 2025-3-29 15:07:57
Legitimacy of Nihilism: Blumenberg’s Post-Gnosticismes the legitimacy of modernity as the New Time, which emerges and asserts itself out of the disappearance of the Old Time. By so doing, Blumenberg, so is the claim, in fact . Gnosticism by an act of post-Gnostic historiography.
表状态
发表于 2025-3-29 18:11:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4729/472821/472821_47.png