arrogant
发表于 2025-3-28 15:53:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4720/471916/471916_41.png
Meditate
发表于 2025-3-28 19:06:24
International and Inter-Agency Misperceptions in the Conflict,ternal communication problems between governmental institutions; rivalries between governmental agencies in general and between armed services in particular; and domestic pressures on the decision-makers generated by extra-governmental organisations.
ADOPT
发表于 2025-3-29 00:11:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4720/471916/471916_43.png
Infusion
发表于 2025-3-29 05:59:20
Public Attitudes and the Future of the Islands,ter Beck examines the nature of the claims to the islands made by the Argentine and the British governments. The British victory in June 1982 concluded the conflict for the immediate future, but the underlying dispute still remains.
Sputum
发表于 2025-3-29 08:31:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4720/471916/471916_45.png
违反
发表于 2025-3-29 14:40:09
,The Role of the Falkland Lobby, 1968–1990,Falkland Lobby was concerned only with the interests of the Falkland Islands Company.. One recent work on the conflict has a useful chapter on the Lobby, but it is both brief and based principally on official records.. In most accounts the Lobby is only a shadowy, perhaps demonic, presence.
半球
发表于 2025-3-29 16:27:44
Intelligence Warning of the Occupation of the Falklands: Some Organisational Issues,ing from the North Korean attack on South Korea in 1950 through the Egyptian and Syrian attacks on Israel in 1973 to the Iraqi attack on Kuwait in 1990.. Despite all the paraphernalia of modern warfare and the intelligence technology available to detect it, warning is evidently still a chancy business.
名次后缀
发表于 2025-3-29 21:24:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4720/471916/471916_48.png
OPINE
发表于 2025-3-30 00:41:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4720/471916/471916_49.png
跟随
发表于 2025-3-30 04:24:40
,The Nature of Anglo-Argentine Diplomacy, 1980–1990,lity, coupled with the raising of trade restrictions and the lifting of the Military Exclusion Zone, has been welcomed as signifying a momentous change. But diplomacy must be the means to an end — the end being a compromise, perhaps embodied in the form of a treaty, that is politically acceptable to the elected governments of both countries.