CHOKE 发表于 2025-3-27 00:09:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4718/471766/471766_31.png斜谷 发表于 2025-3-27 02:28:55
Introductionsis is appropriate for a number of reasons. First, all economies are, at least to some extent, open; they have trading and financial links with other economies. Second, what holds for a closed economy may not hold for an open one. Dropping the closed economy assumption from simple macroeconomic modeoverwrought 发表于 2025-3-27 05:30:56
An Open-Economy Macroeconomic Modelat exist between economies, and to move away from models which concentrate on the operation of closed systems. Of course, this is not to argue that conventional macro analysis ignores such interlinkages, indeed many of the older textbooks in macroeconomics and international economics include discussFecundity 发表于 2025-3-27 12:20:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4718/471766/471766_34.png能得到 发表于 2025-3-27 13:59:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4718/471766/471766_35.pngExplicate 发表于 2025-3-27 18:23:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4718/471766/471766_36.png争吵加 发表于 2025-3-27 22:29:21
Global Macroeconomic Managements a whole, the . schedule introduced in previous chapters loses its relevance. The world economy does not trade with, lend to, or borrow from other economies. In essence we are back within the confines of the closed economy model which is conventionally represented by the . framework.declamation 发表于 2025-3-28 03:15:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4718/471766/471766_38.pngsomnambulism 发表于 2025-3-28 06:49:57
The International Monetary Fund and Stabilisation Policy in Small Open Economiesom it. What policy advice does the Fund offer and is this consistent with the model of the open economy that has been described in earlier chapters of this book? If the advice is inconsistent with such a model how could it be made consistent?ear-canal 发表于 2025-3-28 13:05:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4718/471766/471766_40.png