quick-relievers 发表于 2025-3-21 16:12:53
书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0470777<br><br> <br><br>烧瓶 发表于 2025-3-21 21:37:57
Dracula Conditionals and Discourse,of language, are FEELING entities as well as THINKING entities.. As a case study, I will examine colloquial English expressions such as (1), henceforth ‘Dracula conditionals’ (and abbreviated as ‘DC’).FID 发表于 2025-3-22 01:41:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4708/470777/470777_3.pngaltruism 发表于 2025-3-22 04:38:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4708/470777/470777_4.png威胁你 发表于 2025-3-22 10:11:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4708/470777/470777_5.pngHarpoon 发表于 2025-3-22 14:08:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4708/470777/470777_6.pngORBIT 发表于 2025-3-22 18:43:17
Cleft Sentences and the Territory of Information,ture: Given Information and Known Information. She defined them as follows:.Prince claims that these notions describe the informational value of the ‘presuppositional’ part (henceforth, the P-part) of clefts, the former being relevant to the .-clauses of .-clefts, the latter to the .(/././.)-clauses of .-clefts.参考书目 发表于 2025-3-22 21:44:51
Against Pied Piping in LF,e arguments that has been presented for this hypothesis holds. I will argue that all the facts purported to support the hypothesis, and all the counter-examples that I will present in this paper, can be accounted for by assuming that .-expressions . and quantified NPs are not raised in LF.frenzy 发表于 2025-3-23 04:04:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4708/470777/470777_9.pngmunicipality 发表于 2025-3-23 08:54:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4708/470777/470777_10.png