罗盘
发表于 2025-3-23 13:36:51
Prior On Truth-A First LookPrior distinguishes two cases in which truth or falsity are attributed to propositions. In the first case the proposition is fully specified.
cravat
发表于 2025-3-23 17:48:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4703/470270/470270_12.png
高度赞扬
发表于 2025-3-23 19:24:19
Davidson and Prior on Indirect QuotationSince Davidson’s views on indirect quotation are intimately connected with his views on direct quotation (as was also the case with Frege), we begin this discussion with a comparison of Prior and Davidson on direct quotation.
熟练
发表于 2025-3-24 00:14:18
Davidson on the Triviality of TruthThe term’ true’ has at least the following two types of occurrences.
finale
发表于 2025-3-24 02:39:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4703/470270/470270_15.png
LATER
发表于 2025-3-24 10:19:10
A Model Theory for Sentential QuantificationThe ideas of the previous chapter can be used to give a semantic account of sentential qualification. The key thought is to use sentential quantification in our metalanguage to set out the semantics of sentential quantification in the object language.
Somber
发表于 2025-3-24 11:05:43
0166-6991 ified, that a sentence says what it says whatever thetype of its occurrence, and that sentential quantification is neithereliminable, substitutional, nor referential. The text defends each ofthese principles.978-94-010-6617-4978-94-009-0293-0Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
frugal
发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4703/470270/470270_18.png
商品
发表于 2025-3-24 19:34:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/48/4703/470270/470270_19.png
Interregnum
发表于 2025-3-25 00:08:16
Prior, Frege and Bealer on Typesdjectives, and for adverbs. He does not go in for such quantifications just out of interest in the development of logistic systems. For he takes it, throughout his work on intensionality and truth, that his quantifications reflect what is already present in our everyday generalizations, and he inten