公理 发表于 2025-3-25 03:20:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_21.png低能儿 发表于 2025-3-25 08:21:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_22.png踉跄 发表于 2025-3-25 14:34:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_23.pngSNEER 发表于 2025-3-25 16:13:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_24.png民间传说 发表于 2025-3-25 21:57:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_25.pngcontradict 发表于 2025-3-26 01:21:00
Woman’s Art as Servant of Patriarchy: the Vision of . Reduced to its fundamentals, the question is twofold: is there such a thing as a women’s language, and if there is, what is the relationship between that language and the one employed by those who, in one way or another, have possessed the social and cultural power to create the language against wAdmonish 发表于 2025-3-26 08:21:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_27.png并入 发表于 2025-3-26 12:22:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_28.pngCorral 发表于 2025-3-26 13:40:29
Subversive Sexual Politics: ,“The Natural History of German Life”’ is ‘the best statement, through its sympathetic comment on Riehl’s position, of the grounds for George Eliot’s conservatism’ (E., p. 276). I want to suggest that some of the disjunctive complexity of Eliot’s most explicitly political and most politically conservAssault 发表于 2025-3-26 20:32:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4693/469236/469236_30.png