Asperity
发表于 2025-3-25 03:53:37
Philosophy of Science and Its Historical Reconstructionsot to tell people how to do the philosophy of science. However, I do value the disciplinary intersection of “history and philosophy of science” (HPS); consequently, my subject is what I think HPS used to be about, and what it could still offer us.
STRIA
发表于 2025-3-25 10:19:07
The Underdetermination Debate: How Lack of History Leads to Bad Philosophyht balance between the extremes. Such a formulation reaches beyond the trivial observation that theories are underdetermined if relevant evidence is missing. It should be methodologically useful both for the working scientist and for the historian of science while evading the common objections.
轻打
发表于 2025-3-25 14:56:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_23.png
synovial-joint
发表于 2025-3-25 18:10:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_24.png
prostate-gland
发表于 2025-3-25 22:30:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_25.png
警告
发表于 2025-3-26 01:28:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_26.png
colostrum
发表于 2025-3-26 08:02:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_27.png
干旱
发表于 2025-3-26 09:23:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_28.png
使迷惑
发表于 2025-3-26 14:36:03
The History and Philosophy of Science Historyocial history of science, which focuses on the development of science as a social undertaking within its broader contexts, are both alive in the academy. Nevertheless, these two approaches do not interact very well, and the field of science history is bifurcated along these lines. Indeed, intellectu
马笼头
发表于 2025-3-26 20:22:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4688/468725/468725_30.png