NUDGE
发表于 2025-3-23 13:11:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4672/467108/467108_11.png
CON
发表于 2025-3-23 17:47:21
Innovation in Local Government Risk Financing: Lessons from the UK and Nordic Experiences,from a traditional public sector ethos to a more private sector approach, and its corollary ‘innovation’ (Bovaird and Löffler 2003; Flynn 2007). Innovation was, in the past, anathema to many in the public sector as, by its very nature, it introduced risk into what was a risk-averse environment. For
Accrue
发表于 2025-3-23 20:44:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4672/467108/467108_13.png
Flirtatious
发表于 2025-3-23 23:15:20
Innovation in the Turkish Budgetary System: Recent Developments in Public Governance,hough the public sector became very important in taking on this facilitative role, Turkey has never adopted strict major state control (.) of economic activities. Nevertheless, the state’s role was crucial, with many state economic enterprises being founded, and it undertook the main infrastructural
闪光你我
发表于 2025-3-24 03:07:13
Co-Payments: Innovations in the Balance between Public and Private Finance,ing public services. It focuses on the UK and, specifically on local government services. However, it excludes charges for trading services provided by municipal companies, irrespective of whether they are subsidised by the state or not.
Morbid
发表于 2025-3-24 10:26:26
Innovation in Local Government Risk Financing: Lessons from the UK and Nordic Experiences,ly for the financing of risk, yet comply with rules and regulations relating to the risks they are allowed to take? Risk financing, in this context, refers to the mechanisms in place to ensure that funds are available to meet the financial consequences of unforeseen losses.
事情
发表于 2025-3-24 12:08:53
Stephen J. Bailey (Professor of Public Sector Econ
Itinerant
发表于 2025-3-24 15:01:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4672/467108/467108_18.png
上釉彩
发表于 2025-3-24 19:08:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4672/467108/467108_19.png
fidelity
发表于 2025-3-24 23:34:59
Stephen J. Baileyten verlagert; und dies bedeutet, dass plebisizitäre Verfahren heute nur im Rahmen der Neugliederung von Bundesländern (Art. 29, 118 a GG) sowie im kommunalen Bereich vorgesehen sind (vgl. Art. 28 I 4 GG). Anderes gilt für den Bereich der Landesverfassungen. Hier sind plebiszitäre Verfahren in Gesta