耕种 发表于 2025-3-23 10:38:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4670/466945/466945_11.pngDOTE 发表于 2025-3-23 15:43:04
he work of certain deconstructive literary critics like Paul de Man is relevant to a Marxist critique of ideology. And deconstructive theorists like Christopher Norris are not entirely correct in maintaining that deconstruction is antithetical to Marxism. Similarly the Marxist critics of deconstruct放气 发表于 2025-3-23 18:55:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4670/466945/466945_13.pngeuphoria 发表于 2025-3-24 01:02:20
considering socio-political opportunities and challenges. It also makes economic-related recommendations in tandem with rentier state theory. Unlike the dominant accounts of energy security in Oman, this book sets itself apart by moving away from utilising liberal and realist approaches for its anal吸引力 发表于 2025-3-24 05:34:04
nd which is not really one, as we began, by raising the ghost of an identity. This ghost may well be a certain Derrida, a certain image of deconstruction. But there is no sense that we have moved beyond Derrida. Samuel Weber sums up the problem for us: ‘any attempt to move “beyond” deconstruction ru潜伏期 发表于 2025-3-24 09:03:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4670/466945/466945_16.png变异 发表于 2025-3-24 13:04:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4670/466945/466945_17.pngsleep-spindles 发表于 2025-3-24 16:09:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4670/466945/466945_18.pngfatty-acids 发表于 2025-3-24 21:18:27
little — forcing as ‘word-ghost’: a ghost composed of words, the trace of a trace inscribing words; not a ghost at all but the ghost of a ghost, a spectral signature or trace, haunting the very words on the page and referring, if at all, to an apparitional trembling.是他笨 发表于 2025-3-25 01:03:46
cs or unmediated objectivity, when in fact it is in keeping with a Marxist interest in the way practice mediates both ideality and materiality. I will first review the debate between Marxists and deconstructionists; then I will say why I think a deconstructionist like de Man can be useful to Marxist