解冻
发表于 2025-3-30 10:17:25
István Vassányi,Benedek Szakonyi,Daniela Loi,Angelika Mantur-Vierendeel,Guilherme Correia,Antonio Sos) of practices. Neuroethical address and discourse must engage the realities forged and fostered by brain science no matter where they emerge and deliberate upon neurotechnological applications on the international scale. The invention and application of neurotechnologies are raising questions of e
青石板
发表于 2025-3-30 13:30:29
Consuelo Salgado Soto,Margarita Ramirez Ramirez,Esperanza Manrique Rojas,Rocio Villalon Cañas,Marices) of practices. Neuroethical address and discourse must engage the realities forged and fostered by brain science no matter where they emerge and deliberate upon neurotechnological applications on the international scale. The invention and application of neurotechnologies are raising questions of e
Ruptured-Disk
发表于 2025-3-30 18:09:37
dgment (Greene 2008). These studies have also provided the much-needed impetus for neuroethics itself, having inspired a range of empirical studies on moral judgment (see Christensen and Gomila 2012) and conceptual analyses in ethics informed by neuroscience (see Levy 2007; Racine 2010; Glannon 2007
Noctambulant
发表于 2025-3-30 21:25:50
Joseph Stember,Hrithwik Shalu “complexity economics” and “simplicity economics.” Hayek’s and Keynes’s approaches in the 1930s, although contrarian on many levels, were both part of the “complexity” tradition. In contrast, Keynesianism of the 1950s, Monetarism of the 1960s and also Hayekian libertarian economics of the 1970s and
noxious
发表于 2025-3-31 02:01:25
Adrian Ciobanu,Mihaela Luca,Radu Alexandru Vulpoi,Vasile Liviu Drugh, as we have seen, in the 1950s and 1960s their influence was very constrained. This changed, however, during the last quarter of the twentieth century as a set of novel ideas challenged conventional macroeconomics and gradually transformed the sub-field and became hegemonic. Robert Lucas led the n
匍匐
发表于 2025-3-31 08:29:04
Chanyu Lee,Yutaro Yiwamoto,Lanfen Lin,Hongjie Hu,Yen-Wei Chenantly, in macro policy making, before the end of the millennium. The views of the various tendencies within NCM regarding macro policy were diverse—particularly dissimilar were the New Keynesians—but they all shared a common theoretical conceptualization. A focal tenet was the method of New Classica