老巫婆 发表于 2025-3-26 23:37:18
Book 1977s to form a reasonably coherent whole. Part One treats of informative inference. I argue (Chapter 2) that the traditional principle of induction in its clearest formulation (that laws are confirmed by their positive cases) is clearly false. Other formulations in terms of the ‘uniformity of nature‘ otransient-pain 发表于 2025-3-27 03:56:55
Supportna are at hand. The researcher wishes merely to get a feel for whether a hunch or proto-theory represents a promising line of attack on a problem. Unfortunately, Fisher’s conception is shot full of difficulties,. so much so, that many have doubted whether significance tests are more helpful than misleading..唠叨 发表于 2025-3-27 06:44:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4646/464596/464596_33.png中国纪念碑 发表于 2025-3-27 10:35:12
Inductivism and Probabilismtrue premisses are said to be ‘for the most part true’.. One speaks also of ‘arguments by analogy’, ‘statistical syllogisms’, and the like — terms which further argue that induction and deduction are but two sides of the same inferential coin.genesis 发表于 2025-3-27 17:40:22
Testingracy. Any two theories or hypotheses can be compared in this respect, whether they are exclusive or not, and whether they are drawn from the same or disparate fields of science. In what follows, I will refer to this interpretation of significance tests as ‘the Bayesian evidential interpretation’.系列 发表于 2025-3-27 20:26:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4646/464596/464596_36.pngOptometrist 发表于 2025-3-28 00:00:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4646/464596/464596_37.png不发音 发表于 2025-3-28 06:09:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4646/464596/464596_38.pngGET 发表于 2025-3-28 09:12:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4646/464596/464596_39.pngPrologue 发表于 2025-3-28 11:22:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4646/464596/464596_40.png