挡泥板
发表于 2025-3-30 10:15:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4645/464409/464409_51.png
乱砍
发表于 2025-3-30 15:15:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4645/464409/464409_52.png
Dealing
发表于 2025-3-30 19:11:59
,Equality, Efficiency, and ‘Levelling Down’,who are worse off. The appeal of the ‘levelling down’ argument against egalitarianism is located in a particular reading of the unexceptionableness of the Pareto principle of efficiency, and a particular reading of the requirements of egalitarianism. Both readings are subjected to critical scrutiny in this chapter.
coddle
发表于 2025-3-30 22:05:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4645/464409/464409_54.png
文字
发表于 2025-3-31 02:59:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4645/464409/464409_55.png
全国性
发表于 2025-3-31 06:41:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4645/464409/464409_56.png
性行为放纵者
发表于 2025-3-31 13:16:23
Poverty Comparisons Across Populations of Different Sizes,he question has a surprising amount of philosophical content in it. These questions of logic and normativity are explored briefly here—and shown to have very substantial implications for our diagnosis of magnitudes and trends of poverty in any specific empirical setting.
HUMID
发表于 2025-3-31 16:32:10
2191-5504 ence to background philosophy, logic, facts and values.Addre.This book provides an entry into the subjects of disparity and deprivation, by attending to issues that have a bearing on certain salient philosophical and conceptual aspects of these subjects. The student doing a graduate course in the m
photophobia
发表于 2025-3-31 18:22:49
Book 2019cal and conceptual aspects of these subjects. The student doing a graduate course in the measurement of inequality and poverty is all too often plunged directly into the complexities of Schur-convex functions, dominance conditions, partial orders and the axiomatics of characterization theorems. Ineq
ADAGE
发表于 2025-3-31 21:42:50
Economic Inequality in India and the World, intermediate measures present an empirically striking contrast to the relatively un-alarming trends displayed by the commonly used relative measures—and this is true whether we speak of Indian or global inequality.