Blood-Vessels 发表于 2025-3-23 10:47:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4639/463890/463890_11.pngnovelty 发表于 2025-3-23 15:06:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4639/463890/463890_12.pngFlounder 发表于 2025-3-23 20:58:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4639/463890/463890_13.png枫树 发表于 2025-3-24 00:15:47
Céline Hocquette,Stephen Muggleton genetics, different people react differently to exactly the same treatment. High-intensity focused ultrasound systems and radiation therapy machines are examples of systems where this needs to be taken into account. If we use a conventional monolithic assurance case for such systems, the inherent cBANAL 发表于 2025-3-24 04:06:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4639/463890/463890_15.png平淡而无味 发表于 2025-3-24 06:50:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4639/463890/463890_16.pngSPER 发表于 2025-3-24 11:45:12
Matthias Nickles genetics, different people react differently to exactly the same treatment. High-intensity focused ultrasound systems and radiation therapy machines are examples of systems where this needs to be taken into account. If we use a conventional monolithic assurance case for such systems, the inherent c评论者 发表于 2025-3-24 15:13:33
Johannes Rabold,Michael Siebers,Ute Schmid genetics, different people react differently to exactly the same treatment. High-intensity focused ultrasound systems and radiation therapy machines are examples of systems where this needs to be taken into account. If we use a conventional monolithic assurance case for such systems, the inherent c钳子 发表于 2025-3-24 22:55:35
Tony Ribeiro,Maxime Folschette,Morgan Magnin,Olivier Roux,Katsumi Inoueng where AS operate in complex and dynamic environments. The importance of effective safety monitoring in ensuring the safety of AS through-life is already well documented. These current approaches often rely on utilising monitored information that happens to be available, or are reliant solely on e得意牛 发表于 2025-3-25 02:44:00
Michael Siebers,Ute Schmidroblem is interdisciplinary and related to theories of human error in cognitive psychology. This paper proposes a psychological framework that combines Rasmussen’s performance levels with cross-level errors, represented by post-completion error, to model situations in which different programmers are