Heretical
发表于 2025-3-26 21:16:58
Book 2016tics debate, however, there is much controversy on “what is said”, whether this is aminimal semantic logical form (enriched by saturating pronominals) or a much richer and fully contextualized logical form. This issue will be discussed from several angles. Many of the authors are contextualists and
鞭打
发表于 2025-3-27 02:11:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4637/463692/463692_32.png
路标
发表于 2025-3-27 07:14:31
Alessandro Capone overarching`Principle of Incremental Comprehension‘. ..Audience:. The book is recommended to all linguists,psycholinguists, computational linguists, and others978-0-7923-3806-2978-94-009-1600-5Series ISSN 1873-0043 Series E-ISSN 2215-1788
Allure
发表于 2025-3-27 13:16:45
Book 2016f philosophy of language, theoretical linguistics and communication theory, who answer questions on this important issue. This exciting area of controversy has until now mostly been treated from the viewpoint of philosophy. This volume adds the views from semantics, conversation analysis and socioli
Definitive
发表于 2025-3-27 14:42:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4637/463692/463692_35.png
commonsense
发表于 2025-3-27 21:06:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4637/463692/463692_36.png
Cupping
发表于 2025-3-27 22:29:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4637/463692/463692_37.png
braggadocio
发表于 2025-3-28 05:44:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4637/463692/463692_38.png
纬线
发表于 2025-3-28 07:00:29
When Reporting Others Backfires report is of that utterance and the reported material is attributed to the original speaker. However, in the case of slurring utterances this is not always so. Oftentimes, the offense of slurs occurring in indirect reports manages to get attributed to the reporter rather than the reportee.
Carbon-Monoxide
发表于 2025-3-28 10:26:33
The Question of Reported Speech: Identifying an Occupational Hazardme sense, but the terms used to underpin them are not. ‘Quoting’, ‘paraphrasing’, ‘reporting’, ‘saying’, ‘telling’, ‘speaking’, and ‘using language’ are employed from an everyday lexicon, which invites the quasi-scientific question: “What really are these things?” The question becomes redundant before it can be answered.