Visual-Acuity 发表于 2025-3-25 05:25:16
978-1-349-72072-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016modest 发表于 2025-3-25 10:37:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4630/462962/462962_22.pngLucubrate 发表于 2025-3-25 12:28:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4630/462962/462962_23.png清唱剧 发表于 2025-3-25 18:17:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4630/462962/462962_24.png搬运工 发表于 2025-3-25 23:22:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4630/462962/462962_25.png心神不宁 发表于 2025-3-26 02:53:27
Taking Anti-totalitarianism Seriously: The Emergence of the Aronian Circle in the 1970s,plex but no doubt include France’s particularly ambiguous relationship with this political sensibility and the liberal revival as well as the wider emergence of “neoliberalism” with which it is sometimes associated. As a result, this question has only become an object of serious scholarly enquiry inIncrement 发表于 2025-3-26 06:41:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4630/462962/462962_27.pngPAC 发表于 2025-3-26 11:15:33
Rethinking the French Liberal Moment: Some Thoughts on the Heterogeneous Origins of Lefort and Gaucl revival” has swept up scholars and commentators alike, and is often thought to include the important French philosophers Claude Lefort and Marcel Gauchet. But, as work in intellectual history has shown,. the term sits uneasily on at least these two. On close examination, we see that some of their技术 发表于 2025-3-26 14:54:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4630/462962/462962_29.pngHay-Fever 发表于 2025-3-26 18:55:00
On the Supposed Illiberalism of Republican Political Culture in France,ormer is said to be “liberal” because it at once acknowledges the preeminence of the rights of individuals and social autonomy, refuses to place the state—or the public sphere—in an overhanging position that would give it the power to fashion society according to publicly formulated democratic imper