Classify 发表于 2025-3-25 05:30:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_21.pngRAGE 发表于 2025-3-25 10:21:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_22.png鞭子 发表于 2025-3-25 15:23:59
Tariffs to Avoid Eco-dumping for Terms of Trade Reasons,al (Pigouvian) environmental policy. In certain cases, environmental standards are set below the Pigouvian level for open economy reasons, i.e. to improve terms of trade.. Furthermore, Krutilla argues that environmental policies would not be used to improve terms of trade, if governments could use tarchetype 发表于 2025-3-25 16:21:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_24.pngConduit 发表于 2025-3-25 21:17:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_25.pngfalsehood 发表于 2025-3-26 02:41:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_26.pngSpinous-Process 发表于 2025-3-26 07:47:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_27.pngBILIO 发表于 2025-3-26 12:32:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_28.pngcruise 发表于 2025-3-26 12:39:16
Eco-tariffs and Domestic Environmental Policy,makers in the context of domestic pollution.: Policy proposals have been formulated to introduce tariffs to offset international differences in environmental policy stringency. Yet, current GATT/WTO rules do not sanction such eco-tariffs; neither does the work of the CTE indicate changes which would争议的苹果 发表于 2025-3-26 17:54:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4628/462705/462705_30.png