Twinge
发表于 2025-3-21 18:25:55
书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas, Institutions, and the Politics of Schools in Postwar Britain and Germany读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0460792<br><br> <br><br>
neutrophils
发表于 2025-3-21 21:55:23
2634-6532 n Britain and the Federal Republic Germany.Contributes to mo.This book addresses one the most contentious issues of postwar Western Europe, namely the organization of the primary and secondary stages of schooling in state education systems. In examining the politics of continuity and change in post
intelligible
发表于 2025-3-22 04:00:27
Introduction,rical chapters continue to shape the contemporary politics of schooling in both countries in fundamental ways, before concluding with a review of the book’s research design, methodology, and source material and a summary of the individual chapters.
小木槌
发表于 2025-3-22 08:11:44
Britain III: Comprehensive Change,ly in England. This backlash, the chapter argues, would help to prevent the full “comprehensivization” of English schooling, contributing to the preservation of grammar schools in some areas and the introduction of new selective practices, such as choosing students for schools by “aptitude” rather than ability.
Overdose
发表于 2025-3-22 09:28:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460792/460792_5.png
HUSH
发表于 2025-3-22 14:03:28
The Contemporary Politics of Schooling, and social conditions in the country. The chapter finds that in both countries the postwar discourse and debates examined in the case studies continue strongly to inform politics state education system and shape reform initiatives.
Tartar
发表于 2025-3-22 19:01:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460792/460792_7.png
febrile
发表于 2025-3-22 22:27:06
Britain I: The Tripartite System,s how the beliefs and associated policy views of this discourse influenced a powerful coalition of policy actors, including most notably—and perhaps counterintuitively—the British Labour Party, which helped implement the system’s separate grammar, technical, and secondary modern schools after the war.
climax
发表于 2025-3-23 02:05:47
Organizing General Education,ld War but was reformed in most of the country in the 1960s and 1970s. The chapter then reviews recent literature on the social, economic, and academic impact of school differentiation practices, focusing in particular on their effects on social mobility, labor market placement, and educational opportunity.
网络添麻烦
发表于 2025-3-23 07:42:38
Explaining Educational Outcomes,framework for the British and German cases, which draws on both historical and discursive institutional approaches in comparative politics, and its empirical strategy, which is oriented around a variation of process-tracing methodology tailored specifically for assessing ideational explanations.