短暂
发表于 2025-3-21 16:05:40
书目名称Ideas in Economics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ideas in Economics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0460785<br><br> <br><br>
irreducible
发表于 2025-3-21 20:34:52
Adam Smith: Then and Now, ‘Some of this represents a very valuable effort to set Smith’s work properly into the context of eighteenth century ideas, events and institutions: … some of it can also be seen as symptomatic of another shift in viewpoint’ (Black, 1976, p. 62).
摘要
发表于 2025-3-22 02:28:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460785/460785_3.png
天文台
发表于 2025-3-22 06:26:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460785/460785_4.png
疏远天际
发表于 2025-3-22 08:54:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460785/460785_5.png
Paleontology
发表于 2025-3-22 16:57:12
Adam Smith: Then and Now,se had affected our view of Adam Smith. Professor Black referred to a fresh perspective on the relationship between ethics and economics, noting that: ‘Some of this represents a very valuable effort to set Smith’s work properly into the context of eighteenth century ideas, events and institutions: …
delegate
发表于 2025-3-22 17:40:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460785/460785_7.png
commune
发表于 2025-3-22 21:53:03
,David Ricardo’s Treatment of Wages,y and sometimes acrimonious debate. Yet the fact is that Ricardo’s ‘legacy’ attracts unflagging interest (as a recently published book on the subject — Caravale (ed.) 1985 — bears witness). How can this be explained? I suggest that two factors are particularly germane: interpretative method and the
一瞥
发表于 2025-3-23 04:35:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4608/460785/460785_9.png
彩色
发表于 2025-3-23 07:07:53
,Marx’s , Today,d the modern world. It is bought, sometimes even read, by many who are not professional economists or students facing an examination in economics. Even if its economics were shown to make no sense at all, its status as a classic of modem thought would remain secure. But . is not a compendium of Marx