抗生素
发表于 2025-3-27 00:54:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4603/460267/460267_31.png
Custodian
发表于 2025-3-27 01:52:58
Indicative Conditionals and Conditional Probability: Reply to Pollocktation. The systematic development of the Ramsey test thesis was the work of Ernest Adams, 1975). I think that I can give an argument to show that in Pollock’s example, contrary to what he judges, if . → . is acceptable before one learns ., it is acceptable after one learns ..
厌倦吗你
发表于 2025-3-27 05:54:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4603/460267/460267_33.png
直觉没有
发表于 2025-3-27 11:23:21
Letter to David LewisIt . seem to me worth noting that if P is a probability distribution, and if for any . and ., P.(.) = P(. >.), then P. is a probability distribution too (excepting the absurd case). What it is good for, I would like to suggest, is deliberation — the calculation of expected utilities.
Incise
发表于 2025-3-27 15:29:02
Indicative Conditionals and Conditional ProbabilityIt has been suggested repeatedly in the literature of conditionals that there is an intimate connection between conditionals and conditional probability. Let us symbolize the indicative conditional as ⌐.¬.
MAIZE
发表于 2025-3-27 18:45:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4603/460267/460267_36.png
CREEK
发表于 2025-3-27 23:31:46
The Prior Propensity Account of Subjunctive Conditionals be thought that subjunctives are mere stylistic variants of indicatives, the counterfactual being used only to convey the extra information that we are in a counterfactual belief state. There are striking examples which argue that this is not always the case.
厚颜无耻
发表于 2025-3-28 04:56:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4603/460267/460267_38.png
fatuity
发表于 2025-3-28 10:04:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4603/460267/460267_39.png
慢慢啃
发表于 2025-3-28 11:43:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/47/4603/460267/460267_40.png