cathartic
发表于 2025-3-23 11:31:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4309/430826/430826_11.png
fulmination
发表于 2025-3-23 15:22:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4309/430826/430826_12.png
半导体
发表于 2025-3-23 18:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4309/430826/430826_13.png
制度
发表于 2025-3-23 22:15:57
,Elizabeth Bowen: ‘Becoming-Woman’,ship between mind and body and towards a valorization of the body and the ‘feminine’, Bowen takes a different path, away from gender specificity. I want to follow this move ‘beyond’ gender by making reference to the work of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, which may illuminate aspects of Bowen’s w
placebo
发表于 2025-3-24 04:57:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4309/430826/430826_15.png
Incisor
发表于 2025-3-24 08:57:22
Margaret Drabble: Natality, Labour, Work and Action,ference for this study. In this chapter, I want to connect the novels of Margaret Drabble to some extent with Irigaray, but more particularly with the profound and controversial philosophy of Hannah Arendt (1906–75). Seyla Benhabib has described Arendt as the thinker who has ‘countered Western philo
少量
发表于 2025-3-24 13:44:55
,A. S. Byatt’s Gardens, force’. Nonetheless, her fiction is structured around the dilemma which Radner sees as central to the woman’s novel, defining it in terms of its content and form. That dilemma is of course the ‘mind/body problem’, the conflict which the ‘educated woman’ experiences between the claims of the intelle
剥削
发表于 2025-3-24 18:04:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4309/430826/430826_18.png
舞蹈编排
发表于 2025-3-24 22:24:23
Justice: Origins and Destinations,s”: Are Women’s Novels Feminist Novels?’.. She concluded that they were not, arguing that ‘it is just not possible to say that women-centered writings have any necessary relationship to feminism’ and that it would be misguided ‘to mark a book of interest to feminism because of the centrality it attr
Lucubrate
发表于 2025-3-24 23:59:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00315-0f passage, following the heroine Judith Earle’s life at Cambridge, which has many parallels with Lehmann’s own experiences at Girton in the 1920s. The book was a ., attracting a good deal of criticism because of its open treatment of sexuality. As Lehmann herself commented, ‘it was discussed, and ev