要素
发表于 2025-3-25 03:45:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_21.png
香料
发表于 2025-3-25 11:09:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_22.png
Veneer
发表于 2025-3-25 13:10:56
Reasons: Logic and HyperintensionalityIn this chapter we argue that normative reasons are hyperintensional, and put forward a formal account of this thesis. That reasons are hyperintensional means that logically equivalent propositions may be different reasons for the same thing (be it an action, a duty, an ought, etc.), and therefore cannot be substituted for each other.
伪造者
发表于 2025-3-25 18:16:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_24.png
顶点
发表于 2025-3-25 21:42:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_25.png
overwrought
发表于 2025-3-26 01:28:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_26.png
heterogeneous
发表于 2025-3-26 04:35:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_27.png
META
发表于 2025-3-26 11:52:38
Normative Properties and Higher-Order Supervenience namely reductivism, and I argue that a higher-order supervenience principle, together with a hyperintensional account of properties, deflect Jackson-style arguments against nonreductive normative nonnaturalism.
GRILL
发表于 2025-3-26 12:57:00
Deontic Modals are Hyperintensionalic modals fares better than its rivals in terms of elegance, theoretical simplicity, and explanatory power (e.g. Ross’s paradox, the Gentle Murderer, The Good Samaritan, Free Choice Permission, and the Miners’ Paradox disappear). I then propose a philosophical analysis of this thesis, and outline some consequences.
闪光你我
发表于 2025-3-26 17:32:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4307/430650/430650_30.png