分开
发表于 2025-3-27 00:12:36
Husserl Reader of Bolzanoological and conceptual innovations of the ., such as “sense-giving act-character”, “fulfillment of acts by intuition”, “meaning-intentions”, “meaning-conferring acts” or “forming categorial acts” compounded the bewilderment of its readers.
羞辱
发表于 2025-3-27 04:44:22
Introduction the philosophical work of Franz Brentano and Bernard Bolzano, its reception amongst the so called members of the Munich Circle and its influence on contemporary philosophy. In short, this volume constitutes a “companion” to Husserl’s ..
blithe
发表于 2025-3-27 08:53:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4301/430032/430032_33.png
Nomadic
发表于 2025-3-27 10:13:33
Are Questions Propositions?of his LU.. The topic of this discussion is a courageous if not outrageous Bolzanian contention which, at least on the face of it, flatly contradicts what most philosophers since Aristotle took for granted. ., Bolzano claims, .. Let me call this ..
NAV
发表于 2025-3-27 15:47:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4301/430032/430032_35.png
hieroglyphic
发表于 2025-3-27 19:16:00
The Thetic Role of Consciousnesss of perceiving, acts of remembering, acts of imagining, etc. In particular, Husserl was interested in the difference between acts where we experience things as real and acts in which what we experience has a different status, for example, is experienced as merely imagined or dreamt..
横条
发表于 2025-3-27 23:51:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4301/430032/430032_37.png
collateral
发表于 2025-3-28 03:40:45
Husserl’s Programme of a Wissenschaftslehre in the , monumental work contributes? This question is important for anyone who acknowledges that there is a tension between the logical theme, which concerns namely the objective and ideal character of meaning and reference, and the psychological theme which touches upon the subjective dimension of mental
Banquet
发表于 2025-3-28 07:31:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/44/4301/430032/430032_39.png
Mri485
发表于 2025-3-28 11:13:04
Are Questions Propositions?s to offer as systematic exposition of logic”. Eleven years later the key is a bit lower: These volumes, he now says, occupy “the highest rank in the logical world literature of the 19. century”.. To the best of my knowledge, the most extensive and most thorough discussion of a single contention in