Veneer
发表于 2025-3-23 11:02:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4300/429927/429927_11.png
GROG
发表于 2025-3-23 15:48:42
Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation for Causations seemingly committed to there being . causal relations even of the constant conjunction kind. In response, I argue that Hume’s Idealist is . saddled with this disastrous claim. While accepts the supposition that causes must precede their effects, he rejects the contiguity requirement, and for good reason.
古老
发表于 2025-3-23 19:10:10
Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation for the Divisibility of Spacend (to the best of my knowledge) no Materialist counterpart. So whereas on the Idealist reading, the finite divisibility of space is defensible within the ., on the Materialist interpretation, Hume must remain agnostic on this question (even if he can wield other assumptions he makes in the .).
分离
发表于 2025-3-24 00:52:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4300/429927/429927_14.png
murmur
发表于 2025-3-24 03:22:24
2524-4248 .Defends the very contentious Idealist interpretation of HumThis book defends the very contentious Idealist interpretation of Hume on external objects, and draws from it far-reaching metaphysical and epistemological consequences for Hume’s philosophy. Its interest is both interpretive and analytic.
Gesture
发表于 2025-3-24 10:23:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4300/429927/429927_16.png
fibroblast
发表于 2025-3-24 13:43:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4300/429927/429927_17.png
水槽
发表于 2025-3-24 18:06:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4300/429927/429927_18.png
palliate
发表于 2025-3-24 23:02:10
Interpreting Hume on Bodieshe different interpretations will be to focus on texts in which Hume discusses “bodies” in a systematic way (rather than merely talking about them): section 1.4.2 of the Treatise (“Of scepticism with regard to the senses”) and in the first part of section 12 in the Enquiry (“Of the Academical or Sceptical Philosophy”).
我邪恶
发表于 2025-3-25 02:32:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4300/429927/429927_20.png