obstinate
发表于 2025-3-23 11:19:09
Freedom of Will: A History of Theories,e key to the differences in understanding human nature between the two schools lies in whether people have free will. The classical school assumes man as a rational person, thereby affirming man’s free will, while the positivist school of criminology assumes man as an experienced man, thereby denyin
潜移默化
发表于 2025-3-23 16:27:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4299/429822/429822_12.png
NOMAD
发表于 2025-3-23 21:33:37
Human Nature Foundation of Crime,wever, from the perspective of axiology, the human will is free. This conclusion is of great significance to the study of crime because crime can also be analyzed from the perspectives of ontology and axiology. The ontology of crime regards crime as a social phenomenon, and it belongs to the researc
glacial
发表于 2025-3-23 22:39:27
Human Nature Foundation of Punishment, also take these two perspectives as frameworks to analyze human nature. The ontology of punishment, premised on the ontology of crime, studies punishment as a phenomenon of social control, and it is the study of penology.
树木中
发表于 2025-3-24 04:25:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4299/429822/429822_15.png
Gullible
发表于 2025-3-24 09:39:52
Human Nature Foundation of Administration of Justice,dministration of justice, who is in the core position. The research of judges from the perspective of human nature is of great significance to investigate the human nature foundation of the administration of justice. A judicial activity is a process where judges apply the law, during which two vital
crease
发表于 2025-3-24 11:31:00
ality and experience of humanity.Explores the fundamental is.This book uses humanity-rationality and experience and the freedom of human will as a theoretical perspective to examine the basic framework of criminal law theories constructed by the criminal classic school and the criminal empirical sch
易于出错
发表于 2025-3-24 15:15:41
Lisette van der Poel,Annie Blokhuisrs. The existence and application of any kind of criminal law norm are essentially reasonable only when it is based on the scientific hypothesis of human nature. Therefore, the original thinking of criminal law is bound to extend the theoretical tentacles to the human nature issue with ultimate significance.
Kidney-Failure
发表于 2025-3-24 20:08:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19362-2to him; but if the actions carried out without free will are unworthiness for the actor, which can’t be imputed to him. Therefore, the freedom of will here is a precondition of responsibility, and it is a kind of ethical freedom of choice.
变化无常
发表于 2025-3-25 00:36:31
Introduction,rs. The existence and application of any kind of criminal law norm are essentially reasonable only when it is based on the scientific hypothesis of human nature. Therefore, the original thinking of criminal law is bound to extend the theoretical tentacles to the human nature issue with ultimate significance.