孤独无助 发表于 2025-3-30 11:16:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4298/429776/429776_51.pngheadlong 发表于 2025-3-30 13:13:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4298/429776/429776_52.png奖牌 发表于 2025-3-30 16:50:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30487-8ficant improvements in the understanding of how human and nature interact are thus required to address both challenges comprehensively. Over the past decade, different nature-based approaches, such as Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA), Green Infrastructure (GI), and Nature’s Contributions to People (CRUE 发表于 2025-3-30 23:55:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5ance of plural methodologies for the comprehensive and inclusive evaluation of nature. The chapter provides a primer of five different evaluation approaches of nature: (i) economic/instrumental, (ii) ecological/biophysical, (iii) ethical/intrinsic, (iv) social/shared, and (v) relational. While leverethnology 发表于 2025-3-31 04:35:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4298/429776/429776_55.pngConsensus 发表于 2025-3-31 06:09:33
Choice Theory and Constitutional Design, the other. The concept of socio-ecosystems allows a more integrated approach, in which humans and nature are recognized as interdependent. However, this new perspective does not necessarily eliminate a distinction between humans and nature, or even a hierarchy of humans over nature. This chapter ai变异 发表于 2025-3-31 12:55:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4298/429776/429776_57.png