Monolithic
发表于 2025-3-25 05:37:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429184/429184_21.png
dagger
发表于 2025-3-25 08:30:30
Towards a Theology of Evil: Conclusion and Prospectther, we have looked hard at the elements in the reality which we seek to elucidate and/ or change, so as to understand those elements better and so as to face what is actual rather than of our own fantasies.
Initiative
发表于 2025-3-25 12:51:35
Book 1996t human freedom is highly complex, and so depends upon complex structures in nature. These are both necessary for freedom but also sufficient for natural evil. He offers close analysis of the evolution of the human brain. The book develops a parallel argument that human evil stems from the evolution of personality.
浪费时间
发表于 2025-3-25 16:10:30
Library of Philosophy and Religionhttp://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/429184.jpg
大包裹
发表于 2025-3-25 23:34:56
Human Freedom and the Logic of Evil978-1-349-24321-1Series ISSN 2947-0242 Series E-ISSN 2947-0250
exercise
发表于 2025-3-26 00:51:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429184/429184_26.png
航海太平洋
发表于 2025-3-26 06:28:56
Plantinga’s Free-will Defence: Critique and ProposalIn theoretical theodicy, a free-will defence (hereafter FWD) has a very specific function to perform. Its argument clearly stems from a concern that evil can be best understood as the inevitable byproduct of the creation of human freedom. However, a defence does not aspire to show the truth of such arguments as such but only their reasonableness.
惊惶
发表于 2025-3-26 11:16:42
On the Use of Scientific ArgumentsChapters 6 and 7 describe the human brain and its setting in the process of evolution with a view to illustrating two general claims.
Cloudburst
发表于 2025-3-26 16:41:18
The Evolutionary Setting of Human FreedomIn Chapter 6, it was argued that certain structures of the human brain are prerequisites of human freedom. The next stage of the argument requires an examination of the entailment of natural evil from these structures.
condescend
发表于 2025-3-26 20:25:13
The Logic of Human EvilThe argument of this book so far has shown that that which is necessary for freedom is also sufficient for natural evil. In Chapter 4, it was argued that this line of reasoning is applicable . only to natural evil. Yet in the age of Auschwitz and of mass destruction, human evil is of key interest to the theologian.