tattle
发表于 2025-3-25 07:02:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429111/429111_21.png
Guileless
发表于 2025-3-25 07:46:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429111/429111_22.png
compose
发表于 2025-3-25 14:45:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429111/429111_23.png
得罪
发表于 2025-3-25 19:13:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429111/429111_24.png
上腭
发表于 2025-3-25 22:48:37
Between Principles and Rules.: if we understand Law as a set of commands assisted by sanctions, this, firstly, certainly does not enhance the dignity of the subjects of the Law, who are conceived as passive recipients of orders. Secondly, it leads to separating Law from Moral, which cannot be coerced, but drives us also to ima
确定无疑
发表于 2025-3-26 00:35:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4292/429111/429111_26.png
西瓜
发表于 2025-3-26 05:13:23
The Double Sense of the Law-Dignity Relationship in Emmanuel Levinasty, with the I’s respect for the other as other, even before the advent of positive law; or, it can derive from a social condition demanding respect, even obedience from others, dignity connected with a high office, with authority, social position. The law defends a role, social position, juridical
勾引
发表于 2025-3-26 11:17:06
Human Rights, Rights of the Other, and Preventive Peace: A Levinasian Perspective96). Particularly interesting on this account is his 1985 essay, “The Rights of Man and the Rights of the Other”. With this distinction Levinas evidences how as the rights of identity, human rights do not include the rights of the other. The relationship with the face of the other is a relationship
expansive
发表于 2025-3-26 13:06:02
No Argument: Human Dignity and the Making of Legislationntion. Jeremy Waldron’s engagement, since 1999 when . and . were published, with the democratic and constitutional practice and with the theoretical argument constitutes a rich source of legal, political and social analysis of human dignity. Waldron’s own literature demonstrates that, as an “essenti
Outmoded
发表于 2025-3-26 20:01:14
Is Dignity a Non-contingent Autonomously Juridical “Idea”? A , with Jeremy Waldron more to learn from law than vice versa.” (Waldron). The . which follows endeavours to clarify this assumption, less however in order to reconstitute the “place” of dignity in Jeremy Waldron’s conception of Law (as a decisive component of his defence of normative or ethical positivism and the corres