误传 发表于 2025-3-23 13:20:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_11.pngharmony 发表于 2025-3-23 16:41:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_12.pngFIR 发表于 2025-3-23 21:44:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_13.png言行自由 发表于 2025-3-24 01:40:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_14.pngSoliloquy 发表于 2025-3-24 02:36:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_15.pngLigament 发表于 2025-3-24 07:34:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_16.png玉米棒子 发表于 2025-3-24 14:17:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_17.pngBucket 发表于 2025-3-24 16:20:54
Robyn Dawessal basic income proposal. In 1986, however, the idea was revived by the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada, known as the Macdonald Commission and, once again, the excitement generated by such a radical proposal did not translate into a universal basic incomeBronchial-Tubes 发表于 2025-3-24 22:31:35
Helena Chmura Kraemertury. We must begin transitioning the policy discourse now. Incoming decades we will need both employment and basic income policy. It is good to have MMT advocates on board.”.Thomas Palley, independent economist, Washington, DC, USA."Geoff Crocker‘s book is a very stimulating and provoking contribut原告 发表于 2025-3-24 23:18:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4289/428861/428861_20.png