CRATE
发表于 2025-3-25 03:26:42
ecurity challenges by hackers in nondemocratic regimes like Russia and China. and zooms in on the main challenges that democratic states face in adopting strategies of cyber deterrence, and how those challenges shape their ability to actually deter hackers.978-3-031-54563-4978-3-031-54561-0
Substance-Abuse
发表于 2025-3-25 10:46:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428648/428648_22.png
无瑕疵
发表于 2025-3-25 15:18:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428648/428648_23.png
glacial
发表于 2025-3-25 16:55:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428648/428648_24.png
脱离
发表于 2025-3-25 23:28:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54561-0freedom; cyberspace; liberal democracy; cyber defence; digital networks
Bereavement
发表于 2025-3-26 02:28:01
978-3-031-54563-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
Neutral-Spine
发表于 2025-3-26 08:14:21
Introduction, penalizing hackers, impose limits on the ability of states to benefit much from the traditional focus on denial defense and reliance on international rules. Second, political attributes that define states as democratic generate a set of strengths and weaknesses in the defense of their networks. Any
箴言
发表于 2025-3-26 12:02:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428648/428648_28.png
扔掉掐死你
发表于 2025-3-26 15:38:51
Why Defensive Measures Are Too Defensive: Strategy of Denial,fenders from attackers in authoritarian regimes. I also point out a range of challenges that democracies have faced in cyberspace, which has generated preference for restraint and made denial defense a default response for many states. The second section focuses on challenges with denial strategy, i
遗传
发表于 2025-3-26 18:45:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4287/428648/428648_30.png