prosthesis
发表于 2025-3-25 04:53:05
Book 2018s a process of inclusion through stables forms of recognition, rather than as a process of inclusion through forms of group representation and participation. . .This book will appeal to students and academics of multiculturalism interested in learning more about the usefulness of Honneth’s recogniti
软膏
发表于 2025-3-25 07:43:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428218/428218_22.png
Ascendancy
发表于 2025-3-25 13:36:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428218/428218_23.png
Pert敏捷
发表于 2025-3-25 19:37:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428218/428218_24.png
cogent
发表于 2025-3-26 00:01:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428218/428218_25.png
使成核
发表于 2025-3-26 00:13:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4283/428218/428218_26.png
PATHY
发表于 2025-3-26 07:22:49
Conclusions and Future Directions,ustralia, while the second section addresses the question of the suitability of recognition theory for empirical investigations of this kind. A third section will suggest some avenues for further research that might build on the offerings of this book.
向下五度才偏
发表于 2025-3-26 08:50:37
Recognition Theory, Critical Social Inquiry and Multiculturalism chapter takes a more detailed look at the use of recognition theory in critical intercultural research. Specifically, it expands on the concepts of esteem recognition and contested value horizon, first glimpsed in Chap. ., fleshing out their relevance for this cross-cultural project and for researc
LAVE
发表于 2025-3-26 15:53:21
Work, Esteem Recognition and Multiculturalismeem recognition, for investigations of recognition relations in intercultural contexts. In this sphere, wherein social valuation of individual distinctions, expertise and contributions is understood as constitutive in the growth of self-esteem, Honneth has specifically pinpointed the domain of work.
我吃花盘旋
发表于 2025-3-26 20:09:45
Everyday Intercultural (Mis)Recognition and ‘What One Does For Work’hat occupation’s expectations and duties. Elaborated below, the critical analysis of intercultural (mis)recognition and ‘what one does for work’ is anchored in a reconstruction of all three of Honneth’s critical conceptions of work, and thus esteem recognition associated with the norms of achievemen