finite 发表于 2025-3-26 22:51:26
,Analyzing the Supreme Court’s Verdict on Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code,e Supreme Court (henceforth “the Court”) passed the responsibility to the Legislature, arguing that the law can be annulled only through appropriate legislation. In doing so, the Court observed that section 377 of the Indian Penal Code does not violate any of the constitutional provisions. The Court拱墙 发表于 2025-3-27 01:22:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4282/428161/428161_32.png性上瘾 发表于 2025-3-27 08:06:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4282/428161/428161_33.png胶状 发表于 2025-3-27 09:45:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4282/428161/428161_34.png闲荡 发表于 2025-3-27 16:10:19
The Jurisprudence of Discrimination Against LGBTI Persons: Global Issues and Concerns,he various international human rights instruments related to the protection of sexual orientation and gender identity. In particular, the question addressed is: What does international human rights law expect of States?CLAMP 发表于 2025-3-27 17:58:54
ge.Includes a detailed discussion on the Indian Supreme CourThe book analyses the Indian Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on homosexuality, its current approach and how its position has evolved in the past ten years. It critically analyses the Court’s landmark judgments and its perception of equality,埋葬 发表于 2025-3-28 01:48:48
Interpretative Methods and Judicial Power,amendments; thus, by not striking down Section 377 the Supreme Court has exercised judicial restraint. It has denied fundamental human rights to the LGBTI Community by labelling them the “miniscule minority.”银版照相 发表于 2025-3-28 03:29:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4282/428161/428161_38.pngchemoprevention 发表于 2025-3-28 09:58:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4282/428161/428161_39.png尽责 发表于 2025-3-28 14:13:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4282/428161/428161_40.png