强有力
发表于 2025-3-26 22:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4277/427619/427619_31.png
无脊椎
发表于 2025-3-27 04:15:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4277/427619/427619_32.png
ambivalence
发表于 2025-3-27 07:22:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4277/427619/427619_33.png
惊惶
发表于 2025-3-27 10:31:15
Nahum Kipnisping malignant melanoma. There are three clinical scenarios of concern for transplant patients. The first is the development of melanoma as a result of transmission from the organ donor. The second scenario is a melanoma in the recipient’s medical history. The third clinical scenario is a de novo de
faculty
发表于 2025-3-27 17:22:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4277/427619/427619_35.png
假
发表于 2025-3-27 21:19:23
ic conditions of the skin, hair, nails, scalp, and vascular .This atlas presents a practical and systematic approach for performing dermatologic ultrasound. In recent years, the use of this imaging modality for diagnosing pathologic conditions of the skin, hair, nails, scalp, and soft tissues has gr
Endearing
发表于 2025-3-28 01:43:48
1421-6329 ies. Yet many is sues remain unclear, in particular, the reasons for rejecting Young‘s theory of light. It appears that further progress in the field requires a better grasp of the overall situation in optics and related subjects at the time and a more thorough study of every factor suggested to be
crumble
发表于 2025-3-28 02:38:17
,The response to the principle of interference (1801–1815),reasons: 1) some scientists considered it to be a part of the wave theory, which they disliked; 2) others agreed to separate the two but could not imagine a mechanical model of interference of light. It will be shown that both groups misunderstood the principle of interference as a non-Newtonian theory of colors.
匍匐前进
发表于 2025-3-28 09:56:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4277/427619/427619_39.png
流出
发表于 2025-3-28 10:37:02
The Concept of interference: Historiography and physics,695) advocated the wave hypothesis, while Isaac Newton (1642–1727) was a champion of the emission hypothesis. Throughout the eighteenth century, the “emissionists” had the upper hand, and despite Leonhard Euler’s (1707–1783) efforts to reverse this trend, by 1800, the wave hypothesis was almost universally ignored.