催眠药 发表于 2025-3-26 21:47:54
978-3-030-94588-6The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl平息 发表于 2025-3-27 04:05:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4274/427367/427367_32.pngsleep-spindles 发表于 2025-3-27 06:30:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4274/427367/427367_33.png贫困 发表于 2025-3-27 12:13:15
Alberto FragioEvaluates the development of ecological economics through historical epistemology.Applies Hans Blumenberg’s metaphorology to the history of ecological economics.Debates the decline of the historical s恶臭 发表于 2025-3-27 16:51:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4274/427367/427367_35.pngBrain-Imaging 发表于 2025-3-27 18:14:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4274/427367/427367_36.pngheirloom 发表于 2025-3-27 23:25:31
Styles of Scientific Reasoning as Historiographical Metaphor: A Reply to Martin Kusch, aimed to the production of historical narratives. Following Arnold I. Davidson’s insight, my basic claim is that the styles of reasoning should be taken as a special kind of metaphor, a “historiographical metaphor”, whose purpose is to express the different ways of doing science and writing its history in a context of epistemological pluralism.CHOIR 发表于 2025-3-28 04:28:28
The Crisis of the Historical Style of Economic Reasoning: Joseph A. Schumpeter, Nicholas Georgescu- Schumpeter’s work. The decline of the historical style clearly revealed an irreconcilable conflict among different economic rationalities during the second half of the twentieth century, and brought into question the epistemological legitimacy of economic history with respect to synchronic analysis.不自然 发表于 2025-3-28 08:19:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4274/427367/427367_39.png仲裁者 发表于 2025-3-28 12:50:18
Book 2022onomics, environmental metaphors of scarcity, and mathematical ecology. Using the field of ecological economics as an anchor point, the author reflects on the styles of reasoning in economics with a view towards understanding the nature of disagreement that stems from a failure of communication betw