Feature
发表于 2025-3-25 07:10:03
results on the larval– pupal–adult ?our beetle model. The third and ?nal objective is to better serve the broad readership of this book by including most, but certainly not all, of the research areas in di?eren978-1-4419-2001-0978-0-387-27602-1Series ISSN 0172-6056 Series E-ISSN 2197-5604
Conduit
发表于 2025-3-25 10:12:52
Ileana Borţunresults on the larval– pupal–adult ?our beetle model. The third and ?nal objective is to better serve the broad readership of this book by including most, but certainly not all, of the research areas in di?eren978-1-4419-2001-0978-0-387-27602-1Series ISSN 0172-6056 Series E-ISSN 2197-5604
制定
发表于 2025-3-25 15:41:55
Joseph Cohen,Raphael Zagury-Orlyresults on the larval– pupal–adult ?our beetle model. The third and ?nal objective is to better serve the broad readership of this book by including most, but certainly not all, of the research areas in di?eren978-1-4419-2001-0978-0-387-27602-1Series ISSN 0172-6056 Series E-ISSN 2197-5604
COM
发表于 2025-3-25 17:13:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39232-5Deconstruction and the Other; Derrida and Heidegger; Heidegger, Levinas, Derrida; Levinas and Derrida; L
Ardent
发表于 2025-3-25 22:24:40
978-3-319-81846-7Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
旧石器
发表于 2025-3-26 02:28:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425263/425263_26.png
坚毅
发表于 2025-3-26 07:24:54
Heidegger, Buber and Levinas: Must We Give Priority to Authenticity , Mutuality , Holiness?,ntial relations” of love and friendship (Buber), and holiness (Levinas) as aspects of a good life, though they pull in different directions. We should resist the temptation to take sides in a battle between different approaches to the complex nature of our social being.
暴露他抗议
发表于 2025-3-26 10:14:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425263/425263_28.png
agenda
发表于 2025-3-26 15:02:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4253/425263/425263_29.png
PALMY
发表于 2025-3-26 17:52:06
,The Paradoxical Listening to the Other: Heidegger, Levinas, Derrida – And Gadamer,d part of the twentieth century is marked by the strong contrast that goes from absolute otherness, from an other that is completely other; to the belonging otherness to which we are bound in our being. This contrast determines the various nuances of listening to the other which I intend to address in this paper.