cardiopulmonary 发表于 2025-3-25 04:16:16
Hobbes, Hegel and the Modern Self,t from one another. Peperzak and Siep have rightly emphasised the opposition between Hobbes’s naturalism and Hegel’s idealism.. The major texts by Hobbes and Hegel on political theory, . (1651) and the . (1821), express divergent conceptions of philosophy and political association. Nonetheless Hobbeexhibit 发表于 2025-3-25 09:31:15
,Stirner’s Critique of Hegel: , and the Egoistic Exorcist,epresents what Toews has styled ‘the transformative translation of Hegelian terms’.. The radicalism of Stirner’s critique of Hegel’s standpoint, coupled with his creative development of Hegelian notions of alienation, historical and social forms of conflict and the intrinsic freedom of the human egohardheaded 发表于 2025-3-25 13:04:30
, Stirner and Hegel: The Theory of History and the History of Theory,as detachable in previous interpretations, share a community of purpose and character. In design and practice . is a work devoted to the history of theory. The character of the project upon which Marx and Engels are engaged in . is clearly conveyed in the subtitles of its two volumes, ‘Critique of Mfaction 发表于 2025-3-25 15:50:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425194/425194_24.png蜿蜒而流 发表于 2025-3-25 23:46:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425194/425194_25.pngjeopardize 发表于 2025-3-26 01:08:45
,Lyotard’s Hegel and the Dialectic of Modernity,tomised what Lyotard consistently takes to be the ‘other’ of his own fast-moving thought. Hegel’s otherness is seen to be his rationalist essentialism against which Lyotard’s anti-essentialist and contrary standpoint is defined. Hegel’s philosophy is presumed by Lyotard to consist in the reflectivePrologue 发表于 2025-3-26 07:14:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425194/425194_27.png感染 发表于 2025-3-26 11:09:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425194/425194_28.png提炼 发表于 2025-3-26 12:41:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425194/425194_29.pngCRUC 发表于 2025-3-26 16:47:53
Gary K. Browningagination and reason so that intellect is generated. This inclusion of concrete activities entails that singular knowledge and perfection, rather than aiming solely at the cognition of metaphysical truths, must focus on the complete individual, including ethical and political conditions.