Tinea-Capitis 发表于 2025-3-23 11:32:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425184/425184_11.pngMENT 发表于 2025-3-23 17:21:24
Book 2017colonial and global studies. Analyzing Hegel’s master-slave dialectic and his views on Africa, India, and Islam, it situates these views not only within Hegel’s historical scheme but also within a broader European philosophical context and the debates they have provoked within Hegel scholarship. Eac水獭 发表于 2025-3-23 18:08:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425184/425184_13.pnghidebound 发表于 2025-3-23 23:13:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425184/425184_14.png有组织 发表于 2025-3-24 05:16:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425184/425184_15.png排斥 发表于 2025-3-24 10:14:50
Hegel and Africa,he debates within Hegelian scholarship, the chapter situates Hegel’s views within a broader tradition of European thought that has persistently denigrated non-European cultures, resorting even to pseudo-science in this endeavor.VOK 发表于 2025-3-24 14:37:44
Frantz Fanon: An African Reading of Hegel,ites Hegel’s master-slave dialectic, and how the Hegelian notion of recognition is central to both Fanon’s account of the “black man” as a construction of “white” ideology, and his political agenda for achieving humanity in a necessarily reciprocal fashion. Fanon provides a transition to the next seatopic 发表于 2025-3-24 17:54:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425184/425184_18.pngpessimism 发表于 2025-3-24 20:56:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425184/425184_19.pngPANEL 发表于 2025-3-25 03:01:44
,Gayatri Spivak: An “Indian” Reading of Hegel,vak rejects any outright opposition between East and West or colonized and colonizer. She argues in fact that there is a kind of complicity between Hegel and the . in that they both suspend history as lived experience in favor of general laws, each with an ideological interest. The . aims to give sa