spinal-stenosis 发表于 2025-3-26 23:40:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425183/425183_31.png橡子 发表于 2025-3-27 04:52:31
Introduction,account of the deep structure of being from the perspective of spirit. Much of this interpretation is due to Hegel. The language he employs is not only metaphysical but theological. It invites concrete construals of terms he uses such as God and Spirit.. The Marxists who drew on Hegel in framing diasavage 发表于 2025-3-27 08:45:48
The Hegelian Project,rm one. No attempt will be made to say whether his execution of the project is successful, and to that extent it will be uncritical. It assumes that Hegel’s thought was coherent, and tries to find a way in which it makes sense, for the simple reason that finding a way in which it makes nonsense willfidelity 发表于 2025-3-27 12:26:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425183/425183_34.png披肩 发表于 2025-3-27 16:47:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425183/425183_35.pngIngratiate 发表于 2025-3-27 18:43:08
,On the Theoretical Form of Hegel’s Aesthetics,her notion in that work has received such conflicting commentaries, or diverse evaluations of its capacity to illuminate the difficult situation of modern art, as the thesis ascribed to Hegel that art has come to its end (cf. most recently ). Yet there is no critical edition of the aesthetics lecPALMY 发表于 2025-3-28 00:31:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425183/425183_37.pngfalsehood 发表于 2025-3-28 02:58:35
The Meta-Ontological Option: On Taking the Existential Turn, distinguishes between “ordinary level” concerns, such as whether or not something exists, and “pure categorial” concerns, in which a systematic program is developed for the satisfaction of reason.. Through the non-metaphysical reading one thus avoids confusing transcendental and ordinary domains. Hhankering 发表于 2025-3-28 06:19:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425183/425183_39.pngHabituate 发表于 2025-3-28 10:30:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425183/425183_40.png