现任者
发表于 2025-3-25 04:42:18
International Society and the Academic Study of International Relationsested. There is no doubt that he is a central figure in what has come to be called the English School of international relations — in terms of both his core focus on the idea of international society and of his view of the appropriate methods by which the subject should be studied.. His reception in
瘙痒
发表于 2025-3-25 11:34:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425166/425166_22.png
Nuance
发表于 2025-3-25 13:08:25
Society and Anarchy in International Relations (1966)tral figure in the work of the Committee which provided an important forum for, and stimulus to, his work. As Herbert Butterfield noted in a letter of 5 July 1966: ‘Bull was not an original member of the Committee, but has come to quite a leading position, as his mentality and his notion of the subj
固执点好
发表于 2025-3-25 19:36:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425166/425166_24.png
跑过
发表于 2025-3-25 23:22:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425166/425166_25.png
教育学
发表于 2025-3-26 00:30:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425166/425166_26.png
策略
发表于 2025-3-26 07:15:22
Natural Law and International Relations (1979)e the essential elements of international society. But it became still more important as he came to grapple with the implications of the expansion of international society beyond its original European confines, and with the reality of cultural diversity and of competing and conflicting conceptions o
最高峰
发表于 2025-3-26 09:06:27
The European International Order (1980) what are its limits? What is the nature of relations between insiders and outsiders? And what are the criteria for membership? For Bull and the theorists of international society this was one of the principal questions that needed to be addressed in tracing the history of thought on international r
音乐学者
发表于 2025-3-26 16:39:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4252/425166/425166_29.png
Charitable
发表于 2025-3-26 20:38:01
International Relations as an Academic Pursuit (1972)t obscure the breadth of Bull’s view of international relations as a field of study. He believed that it has a distinctive subject-matter but is not ‘in the full sense’ a subject; it has its own driving concerns and questions but, at the same time, must be open to a wide range of disciplinary and me