Obstruction 发表于 2025-3-23 10:40:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4226/422517/422517_11.png墙壁 发表于 2025-3-23 16:11:36
Gvantsa ElgendashviliIn the measurement of ., events passing a simple preselection are divided into multiple categories, and a maximum likelihood fit is performed simultaneously to the . spectra in all categories. The preselection defines two channels.无力更进 发表于 2025-3-23 21:36:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4226/422517/422517_13.pngInsensate 发表于 2025-3-23 22:10:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4226/422517/422517_14.pngmiracle 发表于 2025-3-24 05:00:15
Originality and Creativity Under Japanese Copyright Law,pt of creativity is interpreted in Japan in much the same way as the concept of originality in other major countries. Creativity is affirmed as long as the author’s individuality can be perceived in the expression, and a higher level of creativity such as novelty or imaginativeness is not required.GENRE 发表于 2025-3-24 09:51:10
Originality as a Key Concept of the Estonian Copyright Law,dments, the same law is still in force. According to the Estonian Copyright Act’s § 4 (2), originality means the author’s own intellectual creation. Since the notion of originality is somewhat abstract, it needs to be interpreted and explained through the relevant case law..In Estonian copyright lawNOVA 发表于 2025-3-24 11:23:48
Originality in Italian Copyright Law: An Overview of the Case Law,e mind having a creative character and belonging to literature, music, figurative arts, architecture, theatre or cinematography, whatever their mode or form of expression, shall be protected.” As opposed to jurisdictions such as UK which have a closed system of copyrightable subject matter, the list流动才波动 发表于 2025-3-24 17:04:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4226/422517/422517_18.png预知 发表于 2025-3-24 19:40:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4226/422517/422517_19.png要求比…更好 发表于 2025-3-25 01:13:50
The Concept of , as Explored in Georgia,ginal. What is considered original varies from country to country, and Georgia is no exception. This chapter shows the ways countries in different legal systems have interpreted originality and locates the Georgian approach among them, taking into account its characteristics. It critically asserts t