最有利
发表于 2025-4-1 02:19:10
Architecture,ents. Many have lamented this divorce. But phenomenology is arguably better equipped than, say, orthodox Marxism or American pragmatism to provide the kind of theoretical framework necessary for reconciling the aggrieved parties and so for making art and architecture central to our understanding of the world and our place in it once again.
EPT
发表于 2025-4-1 06:15:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4220/421906/421906_62.png
ethnology
发表于 2025-4-1 10:18:32
Oskar Becker,cs (Pöggeler, 1996: 29; cf. Sepp, 1998). This conception, however, which Becker anchors mainly in Schelling’s philosophy of nature, does not simply put phenomenology aside, but rather pushes it to its extreme consequences. Interesting in this approach is not simply the fact that the ., which in “Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft” (1911)
EXULT
发表于 2025-4-1 17:19:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4220/421906/421906_64.png
humectant
发表于 2025-4-1 22:10:58
Creativity, the problem of the relations of art to reality, and of the relation of artistic activity to the real. The theory of art as an activity of creation is superior because it solves the problem that the theory of representation acknowledges but is incapable of solving properly.
绑架
发表于 2025-4-2 00:02:37
,Jacques Derrida (1930–2004),e stage for the debate between modernism and postmodernism. His works have had a wide and diverse influence on many disciplines, including fields as different as architecture, art, feminism, filmmaking and film criticism, legal scholarship, music, psychoanalysis, and theology.
值得
发表于 2025-4-2 06:21:11
0923-9545 nomenology and aesthetics, two major sub-disciplines of philHistorically, phenomenology began in Edmund Husserl’s theory of mathematics and logic, went on to focus for him on transcendental rst philosophy and for others on metaphysics, philosophical anthropology, and theory of interpretation. The c-
馆长
发表于 2025-4-2 07:07:49
Aesthetic Experience,the case of taste, it is the experience that counts. His . (1790) opens as follows: “In order to decide whether or not something is beautiful, we do not relate the representation by means of understanding to the object for cognition, but rather relate it by means of the imagination