抱负
发表于 2025-3-25 07:02:18
Youth as Architects of Social Changes part of the problem. The tree that Darwin published in 1859 is a theoretical genealogical framework but, here again, it has not always been understood as such. We show that the classificatory agenda of Darwin included a constraint of monophyly. Darwin clearly recommended what to do with classifica
钻孔
发表于 2025-3-25 10:59:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-098-1scuss them by analyzing how they have been mobilized by some authors in the studies of specific topics in life science. From Buffon to the theories on the origins of life of the second half of the twentieth century, examining closely the approaches of J.-B. Lamarck, L. Pasteur, C. Darwin and C. Bern
fallible
发表于 2025-3-25 12:11:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4214/421302/421302_23.png
antecedence
发表于 2025-3-25 18:25:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4214/421302/421302_24.png
Deadpan
发表于 2025-3-25 21:40:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4214/421302/421302_25.png
Paleontology
发表于 2025-3-26 01:51:45
Sheri Bastien,Halla B. Holmarsdottir distinct conceptions of plasticity: one more dynamic (or Aristotelian) according to which the notion has been described as a property inherent to life whose very organization depends upon it, and an other conception, more passive, according to which “plasticity” means the capacity to express differ
滴注
发表于 2025-3-26 06:27:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4214/421302/421302_27.png
moribund
发表于 2025-3-26 09:49:39
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230390218 systems biology is not basically interested in evolutionary issues, I show that it cannot ignore these. I focus particularly on the search of design principles, which are general principles of regulation and organization thought to be similar in engineering and biological systems. These design prin
Cerumen
发表于 2025-3-26 14:18:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4214/421302/421302_29.png
Fecundity
发表于 2025-3-26 17:07:33
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52470-6 and to what extent it would deprive evolution of any contingency. The last section presents controversies about the units and levels of selection, and, after exposing the philosophical assumptions proper to various positions, sketches a pluralist conception.