体贴 发表于 2025-3-23 09:41:12
Vinicio BusacchiIs the first critical and systematic study on the topic.Looks at the practical implications of a hermeneutical interpretation of psychoanalysis.Uses psychoanalysis as a “laboratory” for the developmen愤慨点吧 发表于 2025-3-23 17:25:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420372/420372_12.png严厉批评 发表于 2025-3-23 18:15:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420372/420372_13.png纯朴 发表于 2025-3-23 22:29:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420372/420372_14.pngAprope 发表于 2025-3-24 04:40:17
Growth and Structural Change: An Overview,Ricoeur’s . must be linked to Merleau-Ponty’s ., first of all because of their common phenomenological “vocation”. . concretely shows the possibility of phenomenology of a broader perspective, of the field of investigation and of application.严重伤害 发表于 2025-3-24 07:25:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/43/4204/420372/420372_16.pngBanister 发表于 2025-3-24 14:09:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16972-6kfurt School, even though he is undeniably a prominent representative of its “second generation” (see Wiggershaus 1994). In a 1981 interview, he stressed that a personal path had brought him close to the philosophical and political positions of the Institut für Sozialforschung (Habermas 1981, 126–155). Speaking with Honneth, he observes:共和国 发表于 2025-3-24 16:24:47
The Netherlands Central Planning Bureau,end of the 1920s and the beginning of the 1930s; and a series of intimate and moral motivations contributed to transforming this encounter into something extremely important in his philosophical research.卵石 发表于 2025-3-24 20:29:15
Financial Behavior of Rural Households,of a dialectic or a conflict between rival hermeneutics is further articulated as a philosophy. The major themes developed in the 1970s and 1980s in applying this hermeneutical view to psychoanalysis, and consequently using psychoanalysis for philosophical ends, may be summarised as four thematic lines.低三下四之人 发表于 2025-3-25 01:50:58
From the , to the ,kfurt School, even though he is undeniably a prominent representative of its “second generation” (see Wiggershaus 1994). In a 1981 interview, he stressed that a personal path had brought him close to the philosophical and political positions of the Institut für Sozialforschung (Habermas 1981, 126–155). Speaking with Honneth, he observes: