shrill
发表于 2025-3-23 12:17:59
,Executive Struggles in Germany 1870–1909,ts role was limited mainly to responding to the individual states’ plans for regulating Gypsies within their borders. While there were periodic efforts to create legislation on a national scale, these never met with success in the prewar period. Instead, the development of Gypsy policy took place mo
尽管
发表于 2025-3-23 16:56:11
,Creating a State of Exception: 1910–1913,utive authorities faced an increasingly challenging international situation which made expulsion more difficult, and despite their admonitions, they faced tensions and problems in implementing their policies on a local level. Those placed in the category of Gypsy felt increasingly challenged as well
血友病
发表于 2025-3-23 18:12:19
,The Courts, 1861–1914,ption as their primary mode of dealing with them. The judicial system served both as a key player in the campaign against Gypsy populations and a hindrance to its implementation. Ultimately, the inability of the judicial system to lay the groundwork for the complete denationalization of Gypsy popula
Pruritus
发表于 2025-3-24 00:35:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/40/3915/391499/391499_14.png
Asparagus
发表于 2025-3-24 05:56:46
Stroke for the Advanced Practice Clinician This process of criminalization, however, often proved more complicated than executive authorities intended. The definition of Gypsies offered by executives in their regulations was amorphous. The resulting confusion of the police led to incomplete and unsatisfactory implementation of executive dir
Cleave
发表于 2025-3-24 09:43:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69864-4aly. The regulations separated Gypsies and “those who acted like them” more sharply from the indigent traveling population. In Germany, unlike in Italy, policy grew increasingly focused on removing Gypsies’ claims to German citizenship as well as nationality. As in Italy, those who “behaved like Gyp
溃烂
发表于 2025-3-24 12:32:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/40/3915/391499/391499_17.png
lymphoma
发表于 2025-3-24 15:35:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1241-0ughly “modern” and bureaucratic in nature. Gypsies ended up existing in a virtual no-man’s land — as “nationality” trumped “citizenship” over the course of the 20th century, as both Gosewinkel and Arendt argue that it did, Gypsies were stripped of their claims to citizenship and nationality, belongi
消毒
发表于 2025-3-24 21:32:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/40/3915/391499/391499_19.png
多骨
发表于 2025-3-25 02:22:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/40/3915/391499/391499_20.png