纠缠,缠绕
发表于 2025-3-25 04:02:03
What Is the Right Amount of Support for a Conclusion?osition, .?” Two answers, deductivism and the Pragma-Dialectical theory, are considered and rejected. It is argued that an argument’s support for its conclusion will be sufficient when it meets its burdens of proof, relying in the final analysis on what may be presumed or accepted without further qu
无法解释
发表于 2025-3-25 09:54:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388883/388883_22.png
大酒杯
发表于 2025-3-25 13:49:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388883/388883_23.png
textile
发表于 2025-3-25 19:49:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388883/388883_24.png
Postmenopause
发表于 2025-3-25 23:42:33
The “Logic” of Informal Logicnd induction. I briefly describe and characterize six accounts that seem on the face of it to portray some third type of assessment of an illative move, independent of deductive validity and of inductive strength: those of Wisdom, Toulmin, Wellman, Rescher, defeasible reasoning theorists such as Pol
克制
发表于 2025-3-26 04:07:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388883/388883_26.png
mechanical
发表于 2025-3-26 08:05:52
Walton’s Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Developmentof what is missing from the account as presented by Walton. I argue that the relation between argumentation and reasoning as it relates to schemes needs to be explained; the problems of classification of schemes within broad types needs to be addressed; a distinction is needed between descriptive an
RAG
发表于 2025-3-26 10:10:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388883/388883_28.png
带来墨水
发表于 2025-3-26 13:50:47
Towards a Philosophy of Argumentments being put to a wide range of uses and that frees the definition of argument from association with any particular use. The goal is to construct a framework in terms of which various particular theories of argument can be seen to have their place, and the various controversies in the field of ar
ANT
发表于 2025-3-26 20:11:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388883/388883_30.png