做事过头
发表于 2025-3-25 06:52:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388837/388837_21.png
泥瓦匠
发表于 2025-3-25 07:57:39
Abelard on Grounding in Ontology and Logic,pose what I think is a much closer and certainly more developed anticipation of theories of grounding as dependence in the work of Peter Abelard. Abelard explicitly appeals to grounding in his account of the ontological structure of substance in terms of what we now call tropes. This theory itself t
Working-Memory
发表于 2025-3-25 14:06:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388837/388837_23.png
xanthelasma
发表于 2025-3-25 16:58:16
Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and John Duns Scotus on the Causation of Proper and Inseparable Accabout in themselves their own necessary and inseparable features. In this paper, I propose that self-agency should be understood as an attempt to clarify the relationship between what is necessary but still accidental, and what is essential. I explore this view in the context of two objections again
名义上
发表于 2025-3-25 21:22:36
Ockham on Priority and Posteriority,as a kind of metaphysical grounding? I offer a close analysis of Ockham’s texts, and I suggest that the answer is probably no. In the course of my analysis, I show that Ockham sparks a debate about priority that was taken up by other fourteenth century thinkers, and I show that Ockham’s view is stri
的阐明
发表于 2025-3-26 01:05:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388837/388837_26.png
传染
发表于 2025-3-26 06:20:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388837/388837_27.png
condone
发表于 2025-3-26 11:55:26
,Up in the Air: Buridan’s Principled Rejection of Grounding, are both free of paradox and ungrounded. This paper outlines and defends Buridan’s approach and suggests that it may give reason to think that ungroundedness is not problematic in semantics or in metaphysics.
中子
发表于 2025-3-26 14:47:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388837/388837_29.png
freight
发表于 2025-3-26 19:32:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/39/3889/388837/388837_30.png